Specialists reviewing evidence during an assessment of SAP projects in Brazil

Assessment & QA for SAP in Brazil

Understand the symptoms before choosing the solution.

When a problem appears in taxes, documents, integrations or operations, its cause may lie elsewhere. TargPoint brings together facts, evidence, risks and priorities to identify what actually needs attention.

ReadinessIndependent QAPost-Go-Live Health Check

When the cause is still unclear

The visible problem may be only the last link in the chain.

More tickets, meetings or isolated fixes will not resolve a situation where processes, configuration, tax, integrations, data and operations tell different stories.

Recurring errors

The symptom disappears temporarily, then returns in another process, document or company.

An unfocused backlog

Many requests are open, but causes, impact, priorities and dependencies remain unclear.

Global and local requirements in conflict

The global template must be preserved, while Brazilian operations need decisions that have not yet been made explicit.

Go-live under pressure

Testing, data, integrations and responsibilities are moving forward without sufficient evidence of readiness.

Fragmented diagnoses

Each team sees part of the issue, but no one connects the process, system and operation end to end.

Unclear regulatory impact

The requirement is known, but its full effect on configuration, documents, data and testing is not.

If the solution and scope are already clear, you may need implementation support. If the question is what is happening and where to start, an assessment provides the basis for that decision.

Need to deliver a project?

Three points of engagement

The assessment depends on your project stage.

The goal is not to apply the same checklist everywhere. It is to address the decision your company needs to make now.

01Before go-live

Readiness

Reviews whether processes, the solution, data, integrations, testing, responsibilities and operations are ready for the next project gate.

02During the program

Independent Assurance & QA

Adds an independent specialist perspective to challenge assumptions, evidence, risks and decisions without replacing existing governance.

03After go-live

Post-Go-Live Health Check

Analyzes symptoms, recurring issues and operational constraints to distinguish stabilization, corrections, improvements, redesign and knowledge gaps.

Specialists using the Observe, Connect, Classify and Decide methodology
No blame gameFacts, context, causes and decisions.

Connecting the evidence

We do not start by asking who got it wrong.

We start by separating observations from assumptions. Then we connect the evidence so the organization can make an informed decision.

01

Observe

Gather symptoms, scenarios, history and available evidence.

02

Connect

Link processes, configuration, tax, custom developments, integrations, data and training.

03

Classify

Distinguish causes, impact, risk, dependencies and urgency.

04

Decide

Define what to address, in what order, by whom and with what level of effort.

What may be contributing to the cause

OperationsProcesses and training
SAP solutionConfiguration, custom developments, integrations and data
Brazilian requirementsSAP localization, tax and regulatory change

Not every finding is a defect

Accurate classification prevents everything from becoming an incident.

The same symptom may call for a correction, an improvement, a redesign, a process change or simply closing a knowledge or data gap.

I

Operational incident

Something interrupts or degrades the operation and requires a controlled response.

M

Improvement

The solution works but could provide greater efficiency, control or clarity.

C

Correction

There is a demonstrable gap between expected and actual behavior.

R

Redesign

The cause cannot be addressed with a targeted fix and requires part of the solution to be reconsidered.

K

Knowledge or data gap

The obstacle involves knowledge, ownership, master data or data quality.

This distinction protects the budget, reduces rework and grounds prioritization in actual impact.

From analysis to action

The findings need to remain useful after the presentation.

The deliverables should give leadership, internal teams and vendors a shared understanding of the situation.

The depth and format depend on the project stage, access to evidence and the decision to be made.

What your organization receives

Executive overviewClassified findingsEvidence-based root causesImpacts and risksPriorities and dependenciesRecommendationsSequenced action planComplexity or effort estimates, where applicable

An assessment is not about assigning blame.

It creates a common basis for better decisions by the client, consulting firm and internal teams. TargPoint can provide an independent assessment without discrediting the people who built or support the solution.

The findings do not dictate a single path

Once the situation is clear, you decide how to proceed.

Implement with TargPoint

Project or remediation

TargPoint takes responsibility for the approved implementation, correction or redesign scope.

SAP in Brazil
Keep your current partner

Delivery with independent QA

Your existing consulting firm delivers the work while TargPoint reviews criteria, risks and evidence.

Working with partners
Manage internally

A plan for governance

The client uses the findings to prioritize the backlog and guide teams and vendors.

SAP insights

You do not need to have identified the cause

Tell us what is happening. Our first conversation helps us understand the problem and agree on the next steps.

If an assessment is appropriate, we define the question it needs to answer, the evidence required and the decision it should make clearer.

Let's understand your situation
plugins premium WordPress
Scroll to Top