Recurring errors
The symptom disappears temporarily, then returns in another process, document or company.
Assessment & QA for SAP in Brazil
When a problem appears in taxes, documents, integrations or operations, its cause may lie elsewhere. TargPoint brings together facts, evidence, risks and priorities to identify what actually needs attention.
When the cause is still unclear
More tickets, meetings or isolated fixes will not resolve a situation where processes, configuration, tax, integrations, data and operations tell different stories.
The symptom disappears temporarily, then returns in another process, document or company.
Many requests are open, but causes, impact, priorities and dependencies remain unclear.
The global template must be preserved, while Brazilian operations need decisions that have not yet been made explicit.
Testing, data, integrations and responsibilities are moving forward without sufficient evidence of readiness.
Each team sees part of the issue, but no one connects the process, system and operation end to end.
The requirement is known, but its full effect on configuration, documents, data and testing is not.
If the solution and scope are already clear, you may need implementation support. If the question is what is happening and where to start, an assessment provides the basis for that decision.
Need to deliver a project?Three points of engagement
The goal is not to apply the same checklist everywhere. It is to address the decision your company needs to make now.
Reviews whether processes, the solution, data, integrations, testing, responsibilities and operations are ready for the next project gate.
Adds an independent specialist perspective to challenge assumptions, evidence, risks and decisions without replacing existing governance.
Analyzes symptoms, recurring issues and operational constraints to distinguish stabilization, corrections, improvements, redesign and knowledge gaps.

Connecting the evidence
We start by separating observations from assumptions. Then we connect the evidence so the organization can make an informed decision.
Gather symptoms, scenarios, history and available evidence.
Link processes, configuration, tax, custom developments, integrations, data and training.
Distinguish causes, impact, risk, dependencies and urgency.
Define what to address, in what order, by whom and with what level of effort.
What may be contributing to the cause
Not every finding is a defect
The same symptom may call for a correction, an improvement, a redesign, a process change or simply closing a knowledge or data gap.
Something interrupts or degrades the operation and requires a controlled response.
The solution works but could provide greater efficiency, control or clarity.
There is a demonstrable gap between expected and actual behavior.
The cause cannot be addressed with a targeted fix and requires part of the solution to be reconsidered.
The obstacle involves knowledge, ownership, master data or data quality.
This distinction protects the budget, reduces rework and grounds prioritization in actual impact.
From analysis to action
The deliverables should give leadership, internal teams and vendors a shared understanding of the situation.
The depth and format depend on the project stage, access to evidence and the decision to be made.
It creates a common basis for better decisions by the client, consulting firm and internal teams. TargPoint can provide an independent assessment without discrediting the people who built or support the solution.
The findings do not dictate a single path
TargPoint takes responsibility for the approved implementation, correction or redesign scope.
SAP in BrazilYour existing consulting firm delivers the work while TargPoint reviews criteria, risks and evidence.
Working with partnersThe client uses the findings to prioritize the backlog and guide teams and vendors.
SAP insightsThe relationship continues through specialized support and ongoing improvement of SAP operations in Brazil.
Explore Support & Continuous ImprovementYou do not need to have identified the cause
If an assessment is appropriate, we define the question it needs to answer, the evidence required and the decision it should make clearer.
Let's understand your situation